Pintrest

Showing posts with label Soapbox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soapbox. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2014

March 13th

Hi, it’s Christina –

They said cold and wicked wind, no one mentioned anything about snow showers! MAKE IT STOP!!!! Please!!!

I did hear from Lys several times yesterday and already today. They are getting positively hammered in Burlington. Classes were suspended yesterday around three, and her classes this morning were cancelled as well. As of ten this morning, the snow was still coming down hard, and they already have over eighteen inches on the ground. Good Grief!

The blog is a little late this morning because I was up on one of my soapboxes fighting a battle, a battle I’m not sure all of you know about, so I am going to give you a little background as well as a copy of a post I made this morning.

As many of you do know, Amazon is the premier place if you have a book to sell. Your standings on Amazon are based on sales, of course, but they are also based on the almighty review. Together the two are plugged into some mysterious calculation which determines your placement on the food chain, a placement which can fluctuate on a minute by minute basis.

Some folks, who Amazon authors have dubbed “The Trolls”, are purposely posting scathing review in order to bring down Indie (self or small publisher) authors rankings. However, Indie authors aren’t the only ones outraged by this. We actually have a “big gun” fighting the good fight along with us; world renowned author, Anne Rice. She is currently in support of a petition to make Amazon change their review policy. I have signed this petition, and I have also spoken out in defense of authors who have been attacked by the trolls.

The proposed fix the petition offers is for Amazon to disallow anonymous reviews and for them to actually verify the person making the review is a living breathing person who has actually read the book or used the product they are reviewing. Below is the comment I made on one of the countless discussions on the subject – this one happened to be asking the reviewer their opinion on the proposed name disclosure (needless to say, they were not overjoyed with the proposal).

There is one small flaw here. The folks who commented above obviously are not the perpetrators or abusers. 

“Thankfully I have not been the victim of "the trolls", but I have seen other authors who have been. (I'm one of those quirky people who reads ALL the reviews on books I may be interested in.) Some attacks are rather viscous and are directed directly at the author and have nothing to do with the book itself; so it really doesn't have anything to do with the author being thin skinned.

“In one instance, a reviewer gave the book a one star review, and in that review had the unmitigated gall to give away the ending of the book - it was a mystery novel. Yes, I am an author, but I do not know all the other authors out there, and I did not know this particular author, but I jumped to her defense and replied to the reviewer. I told the reviewer she had every right to give the book a bad review if that was the way she truly felt, but she had no right to spoil the ending for all the other potential readers. Then, after a little digging, I found similar instances where the same thing happened, so this wasn't an isolated incident, just another well disguised form of an attack.

“If you ignore the names and just read the reviews, you will see they are written by the same handful of people - the words they choose and their phrasing are the tells. I read one author's one star reviews and it was so blatantly obvious two of the four reviews were written by the same person even though the user name was different. 

“I think the real issue is Amazon figuring out a way to weed out these bullies. They have built in algorithms to detect everything under the sun, somehow I'm pretty sure there is one out there to recognize recurring phrasing and word selection and to cross reference it across user names and multiple review. 

“I would suggest only allowing "verified purchases" to be allowed to post reviews, but I fear it would be a short time before the trolls figured out a way to circumvent the system (like purchasing and immediately returning, which would open a whole new can of worms).

“I am all for giving, and actually for receiving, one or two star reviews - if they are warranted. Don't get me wrong, five star reviews are an incredible ego boost, but if I want to grow as a writer, it's the less than stellar reviews which help the most. However, if it is obvious the review didn't even bother reading the story they are reviewing or they are posting multiple bad review using different user names, then they need to be stopped.

“Yes, this was rather long winded, and in the end I have no viable solution to offer up, so, for that, I apologize. Luckily, shoppers are becoming much more savvy and they take both the five star and the one star reviews with a grain of salt. Let's hope Amazon figures out a way to remedy the situation.”

Well, since this blog was rather long winded as well, I shall forego today’s writing challenge. I did not complete my edits on Corporate Blues yesterday, so I will be spending the remainder of my day doing that and writing the blurb for the back of the book. Then tonight I have to go to a Boy Scout meeting; my “nephew” Christopher is becoming a life member.


Until tomorrow. I hope y’all have a wonderful day, and happy writing!

Sunday, September 1, 2013

September 1st Challenge

Hi, it’s Christina –

 
It is Sunday, September 1st and I am going to apologize in advance, but I am about to get up on my soapbox. This rant is about being socially responsible when posting, sharing or forwarding alarming stories on Facebook, Twitter, wherever.

 
You see an alarming post and you feel compelled to share it. It could be about a missing child, a potential disaster, a beloved celebrity passing away, whatever. PLEASE take two minutes to verify the information is accurate, truthful and up to date. This can be done very easily by typing a few key words into your search engine of choice or by going to Snopes.com.

 
If the information is correct, then by all means, post it; but if it’s not, share the link on the original poster’s post debunking it so everyone who saw the original post is aware the information is not true and should not share it.
 
Here are a few examples of recent stories that have been flying around the internet:
 
Jackie Chan, star of multiple martial art movies, was rumored to have fallen to his death during a movie stunt. The poor man was forced to post a photo of himself, holding a current newspaper, to prove the rumors of his demise were greatly exaggerated. The rumor caused people who loved and cared about him a great deal of unwarranted pain.
 
 
In late June, early July, I saw postings looking for 2 and four year old brothers, Cole and Chase who had been kidnapped. Of course, as a mom, I was going to repost the alert, but I checked it out first. Turns out they were safely returned to their grandparents in APRIL. Same held true for several other Amber alerts. Unfortunately many more were valid and I did share the posts on my personal page, but wouldn’t it be good to know everyone I saw was valid?
 
Other alarming posts were photos of the ocean outside the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant in Japan boiling, and color satellite photos of the leak headed straight for the west coast of North America. Upon further inspection, photos shot from a different angle showed the boiling water was actually just fog and in reality the color satellite photo was the path of the tsunami waves from the 2011 tsunami and not of a nuclear leak. YES, the plant is in a state of emergency, and yes we should all probably be concerned for the thousands of people the disaster will affect; but get the facts straight so you don’t cause a panic.

 
We need to ban together and stop these erroneous posts. They are the equivalent of yelling “FIRE” in a crowded movie theater. Think before you repost, and when you do repost, add a tagline stating verified on such-and-such a date. When you debunk something, post it. It is embarrassing to have something you have posted debunked and it makes you think twice before blindly reposting.

 
OK, I’m done complaining. I hope you have a wonderful day, and happy writing!
Your Last Challenge was:

I can’t seem to get that song out of my head…


Chad pressed his hands to his temples and squeezed, hard. “Why can’t I get this song out of my head? What does it mean? Dammit!”

Several months ago, while on a call, Chad had been shot. Just a graze to the head, nothing life threatening, but the incident left a scar as well as an unusual side effect. He noticed the change when he returned to his first case after the accident. He and his partner Tom were assigned to a missing child case, a case with no clues, no leads.

That’s when the song “Under the Boardwalk” started playing over and over in his mind. It had tormented night and day until, out of frustration, he drove down to the beach and took a walk under the boardwalk, and that’s where he found the missing child, being held captive in a cage like a dog. The moment he freed her, the song stopped playing in his mind.

He had chocked it up to coincidence or he saw a clue which only registered subliminally, but then it happened again, and again.
 

Hmmm…may be a real story in there…

Your Next Challenge is:

 

Slowly he turned…step by step…inch by inch…

 

You have 10 minutes (be honest). There is no right or wrong, just write. Spelling and punctuation don’t count and NO ONE is allowed to criticize what someone else has written. Go.